CLASS-L Archives

October 2002

CLASS-L@LISTS.SUNYSB.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
"Classification, clustering, and phylogeny estimation" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
classification comparison
From:
Henry Bulley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:29:26 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<DB11680A8DE2D511964300B0D0EA1DA60128DA02@SRV_MBE>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"Classification, clustering, and phylogeny estimation" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (9 lines) 
Hi all,

I am working on different classification methods based on ecological
(spatial) variables. I would be glad if any of you could direct me to
literature on comparing the different classifications methods as to which
one is better.

  Henry

ATOM RSS1 RSS2