CLASS-L Archives

February 2003

CLASS-L@LISTS.SUNYSB.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"Classification, clustering, and phylogeny estimation" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Sirotkin, Alexander" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:24:11 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"Classification, clustering, and phylogeny estimation" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Hello.

 From a few responses I got to my previous email I understand that I
did not formulate my question clear enough.

What I meant by "compare two clusterings" is not to find out which
clustering is better - this information is usually provided by the k-means
algorithm in a form of within-cluster sum of squares.

What I actually meant was a measure of how much these two clusters
are similar. In other words - if two points belong to the same cluster
in both clusterings this means that they are similar.

Thanks a lot....

ATOM RSS1 RSS2