Content-Type: |
multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_01C50B89.8B9E9C60" |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 13:49:42 -0600 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Organization: |
Baylor |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have 3 classes and hundreds of attributes each with ~50 values
(continuous, but discretized based on quartiles). After calculating
information gain for each attribute I sort the information gain in
descending order. My goal is not to generate a tree, but rather to perform
instance-based learning using the cumulative list of attributes selected.
Something I have not seen in the literature is what to do if a majority of
the attributes with the greatest information gain have less impurity but in
one particular class. Given this problem, is there a commonly used method
for weighting or selecting attributes which are the purest for a class? (I
have tried selecting attributes with the greatest gain for each class,
looping through 3 classes each time I select the next best attribute, and
that seemed to work better than just selecting attributes with the greatest
gain). Do I need to "prune" unwanted attributes? If so, are there any
papers which show background methods and criteria for pruning unwanted
attributes in instance-based learning?
Last, another remaining question is that because my goal is not really to
build a hierarchical tree, each time I select an attribute I use the
accumulated attribute data and loop through all of the objects (train) in
order to assign each object to the predicted class. Each time I add an
attribute, a confusion matrix is generated for classification of all the
objects -- from which I obtain accuracy. So I get a confusion matrix for
the cumulative list of attributes at each step. In this scenario, when
should I stop selecting attributes? Recall that I am not building a tree
for which I can assess purity in each node, but rather picking off
attributes to train and generate a confusion matrix in instance-based
learning.
|
|
|